![]() ![]() Unfortunately, the opposition was so effective that the Board of Supervisors decided to table discussion on Route 432, even after approving Fairfax Connector’s other proposed routes. They fear that more buses would turn their quiet neighborhood into a loud urban freeway. The residents interrupted the 2-hour question-and-answer section with comments that school buses had struck parked cars. They say the buses will endanger pedestrians and parked vehicles.Ī small group of 3 residents practically took over a public meeting last February where 100 people came to hear about the proposals. Many residents support better bus service in this area due to the highly congested nature of Route 7 (Leesburg Pike) and Route 123 (Chain Bridge Road/Maple Avenue), the main roads into Tysons.īut residents living on Old Courthouse Road and Creek Crossing Road have overtaken the discussion about one of the 4 proposed route options that would use those two streets. The proposed Route 432 would connect northern Vienna with the Spring Hill Metro Station and Tysons in a loop, filling a critical gap in the county’s transit network. All images from Fairfax Connector and edited by the author. The new lanes are scheduled to open to traffic in 2024.Option 1, one of 4 alternatives for Route 432. The endorsement passed in a 8 to 2 vote, with Foust and Hunter Mill District Supervisor Walter Alcorn voting against it. “This is a chance for Fairfax County to be a leader,” Supervisor Pat Herrity agreed, “and I think this encourages Maryland to move forward.” Everyone is familiar with the gridlock that Foust has explained…We’re close to a guarantee that Maryland is making significant progress.” “There are some signfiicant benefits to this project. “We don’t entirely control the schedule here,” McKay said. Board of Supervisors Chairman Jeff McKay and others on the board described the endorsement as a good-faith move on Fairfax’s part. Going forward without agreement from Maryland is exposing us to worsening impacts.”īut Fairfax County has faced mounting pressure to endorse 495 NEXT, most recently from Virginia Secretary of Transportation Shannon Valentine. “I want to make it clear, I think it’s a mistake. “Of course that hasn’t happened, nothing significant has happened since December to justify us reversing our opinion,” Foust said. Foust’s frustration comes from Maryland dragging its heels on the project despite an earlier pledged commitment to widening.įoust said that, as recently as December, the Board agreed that VDOT should only consider further action on widening once Maryland executed a comprehensive agreement with a developer to fulfill their half of the project. The plan would add new express lanes from 495’s intersection with the Dulles Toll Road up to the American Legion Bridge, where the plan was to connect with similar lanes on the Maryland-owned bridge and onto the Maryland side of the beltway. “But without the Maryland project, 495 NEXT worsens traffic in the general portion lanes…Until the American Legion Bridge is widened, these adverse impacts are far greater than any public benefit.” “I’ve lived with the horrible congestion caused by backups at the American Legion Bridge and I’ve supported widening or replacement of the bridge,” Foust said. Supervisor John Foust, representing the Dranesville District that would ostensibly stand the most to gain from the project called 495 NEXT, said the project only addresses half the problem and, without the other half, could only worsen an already miserable bottleneck. ![]() (Updated at 2:10 p.m.) Officially, the Fairfax County Board of Supervisors endorsed the I-495 extension of the express lanes on Tuesday (April 13), but the discussion leading up to that vote showed that some officials closest to the project still have reservations. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |